Celeron "A" Mendocino
IT NOTICES: this information is partially out of date, since he contemplates the mikes Celeron in format PPGA or Socket370 not even the Celeron at speeds superior to 333 MHz. To know more on this question, consult in the margin the related topics.
It does a pair of months it seemed that the only news that could arise on the part of Intel on the market of the microprocessors it was that a model of Pentium II was appearing with one more MHz fistful. But, for good or for evil, the things are never so simple with Intel...
If we ask someone moderately informed in these topics what the Celeron thinks of, it is almost sure that he will answer us that it is a question of a quite mediocre chip; and partly it will be right. As we mention already on these pages, any chip that he should lack cache memory of the second level (well in the cartridge SEC like Pentium II, good in the badge as the AMD K6-2) will not be able to obtain good results in "serious" applications like the office computerization, and the only one very good unit of floating comma (for mathematical calculations and 3D) will save him of doing same ridiculously in the games.
So although the mark Celeron is not of most appreciated on the market, Intel does dull ears and there extracts a new model of microprocessor whom also it names Celeron (with one "To" added or the internal name of the project, Mendocino), but whose characteristics have not anything in common with the previous models. The new Celeron yes have cache memory of the second level, what does that they are much better than the ancient ones (?) Celeron.
Curiously, they have the cache memory in the encapsulated proper one of the chip (moreover close that in Pentium II, which have it inside the cartridge but out of the encapsulated one), a system of manufacture that Intel was not using from the times of Pentium Pro. This does that the nucleus of the chip is more voluminous than that of the previous Celeron or Pentium II, what observes easily put that the Celeron lack protective cartridge (we suppose that to low the price of costs):
In particular they have 128 KB of secondary cache memory, the fourth part of the one that has a Pentium II. But while at Pentium II the above mentioned cache memory is employed to half of the internal speed of the mike (to 150 MHz for a Pentium II to 300 MHz, for example), at the new Celeron it is employed at the same speed as the mike. This supposes that it works to 300 ó 333 MHz, according to the model, what turns out to be almost incredible: it is very difficult to achieve that a few memory chips reach this speed of stable form, as one has seen with the SDRAM chips to only 100 MHz, which incompatibilities forced Intel to define the standard PC100 to obtain a few quality minimums independent from the mark of the memory.
Otherwise, the Celeron has the same nucleus as the most modern Pentium II, the models to 350 MHz or more, for what his unit of floating comma is so good as in them. The conjunction of these factors (technology Pentium II, small but rapid cache memory and good mathematical yield) they do this chip a very good election, only one step below the Pentium II.: How much for below? Well, now we go with that.
Let's see the famous and debatable "index first iCOMP" of the same Intel:
In view of the graph, we extract two conclusions:
Very well, if the index iCOMP is so debatable at the time of comparing the Pentium II with the Mendocino: what other tests can we use? Since for example the Winstone 98 of Ziff-Davis, which measures the yield in typical applications like Word, Lotus 123, Netscape Navigator, CorelDraw! and others:
Under these circumstances, the yield of Pentium II is only 1 % top and enclosed the 333 MHz Mendocino proves between 4 and 7 % top to Pentium II to 300 MHz, turned out perhaps slightly high but that seem closer to the reality (I do not know you, but I believe that the people work much more with Word than with the iCOMP). For that it seems strange to them that we use ZDNet information instead of Intel, to say that it is due to the fact that Intel realizes these tests in very different conditions for two types of microprocessor (it tackles EX-and disc IDE for the Celeron against badge BX and disc SCSI for Pentium II); nevertheless the Intel information is included for Pentium II as comparative element.
We might compare tests 3D, but I save them the effort: the results of the Mendocino and of Pentium II are almost identical in games 3D and only a little low in more serious applications like CAD (logician, since in these cases the cache memory quantity is not so important as the speed of the unit mathematical - identical - and the proper presence or not of the cache memory).
I dress everything previous, and leaving us of tests and tecnicismos: the slower is a Mendocino opposite to a Pentium II? Since very little, the equivalent to scarcely a fistful of MHz, between 10 and 40 MHz according to the applications that we use. Let's say that a Celeron Mendocino to 333 MHz is worse than a Pentium II to 333 MHz, but slightly better than a Pentium II to 300 MHz; with 300 MHz that (eye, "To", not the ancient one without cache memory) the same happens.
Then: why is it so cheap (relatively) opposite to Pentium II? For two motives:
Certainly: how is it of good opposite to an AMD K6-2? Since seemed to opposite to a Pentium II: slightly slower in almost quite, but very little. Also, since he does not need that the games or drivers of screen they are optimized for 3DNow! not that the DirectX 6 uses, his yield in ancient games is better that that of the K6-2 (although if there exist the above mentioned optimizations the K6-2 it is faster). Certainly, I recommend to the users of K6-2 to spend for the web sites of the manufacturers of these games 3D type Quake II to him and for those of the manufacturers of videocards, periodically there appear patches and updates that make use of the characteristics 3DNow! of his mikes.
Then: is it worth it? Yes, of course, although bearing in mind that:
And to end at once, a curious note: it was doing years that a such trouble did not see with the name of a mike: some call it "Celeron 300th" (O.K)., other "Celeron Mendocino" (O.K)., other "Celeron 333" (without the "A"; in agreement, this way it calls it Intel, since 333 MHz that does not exist without cache memory), but other "Mendecino" (!), "Mendocinio" (!) and enclosed "Mendeccino" (!!!). I do not know, I believe that it is Mendocino, but if so much trouble creates that they call him "Celeron with cache memory" and we will understand each other all although we do not know Italian...